Polyheaded creature.mp3
Maybe there are shareholders of artistic vision [rough label to describe the word - but even that is a textual representation] I’m labelling this group as the unofficial ‘everyone researching “that” collective’, and I’m the designated writer for this apparent group. Even BANK art collective is too tamed for this group, as it exists in the physical realm.
I don’t know how big the denominator is, but it's not the same as generational wealth or physical inheritance, where children of the shareholders attain it. It transmits through vicarious interest and parasocial dynamics. I was able to know person XX through person XY years before I met person XX. It’s uncanny as my work has adopted abstract characteristics of them both, and their internal image are my guides for the immaterial. When I was preparing this post, like clockwork I dreamt of passing by them both in my dream one night. They probably passed me the relevant information to write this. Maybe it’s both the anima and animus working together.
The work produced by one person belongs to all the shareholders, but legitimately belongs to one. This is why I find trademarking common words and phrases hinders cultural progress. But in a bad economy, people are desperate to monopolise all the shares. You see this pattern in tech too.
This curatorial direction is a curious one:
‘PIGDOGANDMONKEYFESTOS [exhibition] is partly defined by the artists’ interpretation of what a manifesto is, should or could be, the exhibition as a whole is a celebration of difference and freedom rather than the endorsement of a single style or line of enquiry.’
In Chinese zodiac, these animals: the pig, dog and monkey have a weird dynamic due to the differences of temperament, a bit like the sun factory, where the misfits all meet each other within the context of the architecture. (Using intertextuality to my advantage there). I see manifestos as an opportunity for different temperaments to make mutual agreements on the shared commonality of the group, that would benefit culture.
On a whim.mp3
The PigDogandMonkeyManifestos was a show happening when I was studying fine art in Stoke and thought that the purpose of art was to look aesthetically good as I haven't learnt the codes and conventions of fine art. This was my second choice of university. My first choice was BCU, but didn’t get in because I had food poisoning before the interview. Maybe I was supposed to.
It wouldn’t be the same blog if I haven’t had food poisoning. There probably wouldn’t be a blog at all, or in all fickleness of reality, it would have been a different shareholder writing it.
Next post: Crime_and_curiosity05.cda
I have a few contenders but I feel this next topic deserves to be next. I’ll write more about Thomas More’s “no place” - where the shareholders are, and might even write about spirituality, in the post after the next one. I usually have a rough idea then write off the cuff and in one sitting, and then edit it post-publish. We’ll see what happens.


